{"id":3635,"date":"2020-05-20T17:24:00","date_gmt":"2020-05-20T17:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/?p=3635"},"modified":"2020-08-21T06:38:51","modified_gmt":"2020-08-21T06:38:51","slug":"can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/","title":{"rendered":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor?"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"932\" src=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg\"  data-id=\"3636\" data-link=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/?attachment_id=3636\" class=\"wp-image-3636\" alt=\"Artificial Intelligence \u2013 Patent Inventor\" title=\"Artificial Intelligence \u2013 Patent Inventor\" srcset=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-150x137.jpg 150w, https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-300x273.jpg 300w, https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-768x699.jpg 768w, https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-680x619.jpg 680w, https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent.jpg 1594w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The\r\nUnited States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was recently required to\r\ndetermine whether a patent application may list artificial intelligence as an\r\ninventor. At issue were two patent applications for two separate, seemingly\r\nmundane devices. One application described a shape-shifting container for food and\r\nthe other an emergency flashlight. The two inventions were created by DABUS, an\r\nartificial intelligence system created by physicist and artificial intelligence\r\nresearcher Stephen Thaler. In a published decision, the USPTO determined that neither\r\nDABUS, nor any other artificial intelligence, can be listed as an inventor on a\r\npatent filing.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For\r\na patent to be granted, it must satisfy certain requirements. The invention\r\nmust be (1) patent eligible in that it is either a machine, process, article of\r\nmanufacture, or a composition of matter; (2) useful; (3) new; (4) nonobvious;\r\nand (5) described with enough particularity that a person of ordinary skill in\r\nthe relevant technology field would understand the invention without undue\r\nexperimentation. Aside from these patentability requirements, the application\r\nmust be filed with certain documentation, including, among others, an\r\napplication data sheet which identifies the inventor(s).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; When\r\nfiled, the application papers at issue included an application data sheet, a substitute\r\nstatement in lieu of a declaration, an inventorship statement, and assignment\r\ndocumentation assigning the entire right title and interest to Stephen Thaler. The\r\napplication data sheet, which identifies the inventor or joint inventors of an\r\ninvention, identified a single inventor with the given name \u201cDABUS\u201d and the\r\nfamily name \u201cInvention generated by artificial intelligence.\u201d Similarly, the\r\nsubstitute statement was executed by Stephen Thaler, who identified himself as\r\nthe legal representative of DABUS and the applicant of the invention. Substitute\r\nstatements take the place of an oath or declaration when an inventor is\r\ndeceased, under a legal incapacity, has refused to execute an oath or\r\ndeclaration, or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In\r\nAugust 2019, a Notice to File Missing Parts was issued, which indicated the\r\napplication data sheet \u201cdid not identify each inventor by his or her legal\r\nname.\u201d In instances where a Notice to File Missing Parts is issued, the patent\r\napplication will still be accorded a filing date and application number. The\r\napplicant is then given a certain time period (usually two months) to file all\r\nrequired items and any fee. In this case, although the Notice sought a new\r\napplication data sheet with correct inventorship, the applicant instead filed a\r\npetition requesting supervisory review of the Notice. This petition was dismissed,\r\nand the applicant requested reconsideration of this decision. The USPTO agreed\r\nwith the prior ruling and therefore, refused to vacate the decision.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; According\r\nto the applicant, DABUS is programmed as a series of neural networks that have\r\nbeen trained with general information in the field of endeavor to independently\r\ncreate the invention. Thaler claims it was DABUS, not a person, that recognized\r\nthe novelty and importance of the purported invention. Moreover, DABUS was not\r\ntrained to solve any specific problem nor was it trained on any special data\r\nrelevant to the invention at issue. As a result, Thaler maintains the position\r\nthat inventorship should not be limited to natural persons.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In\r\nexplaining its decision, the USPTO provided several statutes, including that\r\nwhich sets forth the requirement that a patent application include \u201cthe name of\r\nthe inventor for any invention claimed in the application\u201d and that which\r\ndefines \u201cinventor\u201d as \u201cthe individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals\r\ncollectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention.\u201d The\r\nUSPTO determined that the statute precludes the applicant\u2019s proposed broad interpretation\r\nof \u201cinventor.\u201d Indeed, it was also explained that the terms \u201cwhoever,\u201d \u201chimself,\u201d\r\n\u201cherself,\u201d and \u201cperson\u201d suggest a natural person and not a machine. Further,\r\nthe USPTO cited several Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decisions that set\r\nforth that drafted must be natural persons. Overall, the USPTO found that the language\r\nof the patent laws as written by Congress and as subsequently interpreted by\r\ncourts unequivocally supports the position that machines cannot be inventors.<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was recently required to determine whether a patent application may list artificial intelligence as an inventor. At issue were two patent applications for two separate, seemingly mundane devices. One application described a shape-shifting container for food and the other an emergency flashlight. The two inventions were&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"gallery","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-gallery","hentry","category-patent-and-trademark","post_format-post-format-gallery"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Omni Legal Group Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Omid Khalifeh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Omid Khalifeh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Omid Khalifeh\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4\"},\"headline\":\"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor?\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\"},\"wordCount\":737,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Patent and Trademark\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\",\"name\":\"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4\"},\"description\":\"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent.jpg\",\"width\":1594,\"height\":1451},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Omni Legal Group Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4\",\"name\":\"Omid Khalifeh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/565923ffc8a80adddedf281a6f7f8052a83bed9b1506537aa4654cebd9b3097a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/565923ffc8a80adddedf281a6f7f8052a83bed9b1506537aa4654cebd9b3097a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Omid Khalifeh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/author\/omid-khalifeh\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog","description":"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog","og_description":"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.","og_url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/","og_site_name":"Omni Legal Group Blog","article_published_time":"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Omid Khalifeh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Omid Khalifeh","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/"},"author":{"name":"Omid Khalifeh","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4"},"headline":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor?","datePublished":"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/"},"wordCount":737,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg","articleSection":["Patent and Trademark"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/","url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/","name":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor? - Omni Legal Group Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent-1024x932.jpg","datePublished":"2020-05-20T17:24:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-21T06:38:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4"},"description":"Stephen Thaler filed an application to list AI as inventor whereas USPTO ruled against him. Read Omnilegal blog to learn more about this interesting case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/USPTO-Patent.jpg","width":1594,"height":1451},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/can-artificial-intelligence-be-a-patent-inventor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can artificial intelligence be a patent inventor?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/","name":"Omni Legal Group Blog","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e88d4972c6e30001cc41817b64d35fa4","name":"Omid Khalifeh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/565923ffc8a80adddedf281a6f7f8052a83bed9b1506537aa4654cebd9b3097a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/565923ffc8a80adddedf281a6f7f8052a83bed9b1506537aa4654cebd9b3097a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Omid Khalifeh"},"url":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/author\/omid-khalifeh\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3635"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3635\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3690,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3635\/revisions\/3690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omnilegalgroup.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}