Omni Legal Group logo
Omni Legal Group Blog Omni Legal Group Blog
  • ABOUT US
  • SERVICES
    • BUSINESS LAW
      • BUSINESS LITIGATION
      • BUSINESS FORMATIONS/TRANSACTIONS
      • BUSINESS CONSULTANCY
    • PATENTS
      • PATENT FILING
        • DESIGN PATENT
        • UTILITY PATENT
      • PATENT LITIGATION
    • Trademarks
      • TRADEMARK FILING
        • TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
        • TRADEMARK TRANSFERS
        • TRADEMARK SEARCHES
        • INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS
      • TRADEMARK LITIGATION
    • copyrights
    • Cyber Law
    • Trade Secret LAW
    • Mediation
  • CONTACT US
    • Los Angeles
    • Beverly Hills
    • Santa Monica
  • RESOURCES
    • VIDEOS
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • HELPFUL LINKS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • FAQ’s
  • Philanthropy
  • ABOUT US
  • SERVICES
    • BUSINESS LAW
    • PATENTS
    • Trademarks
    • copyrights
    • Cyber Law
    • Trade Secret LAW
    • Mediation
  • CONTACT US
    • Los Angeles
    • Beverly Hills
    • Santa Monica
  • RESOURCES
    • VIDEOS
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • HELPFUL LINKS
    • IN THE NEWS
    • FAQ’s
  • Philanthropy
  •  

Blog

The Future of Copyright: How Technology is Shaping Creative Rights

When you think of copyright, you might picture a songwriter protecting their lyrics or a filmmaker guarding their script. But today, copyright is much bigger than that. Technology has flipped the creative world upside down, from streaming platforms to TikTok trends to artificial intelligence. As a result, the way we protect creative work is changing just as fast as the way we consume it. The big question is: how will copyright law keep up?

Take music as an example. Back in the early 2000s, the rise of Napster changed everything. Suddenly, anyone could download songs for free, and the music industry scrambled to protect artists’ rights. That fight eventually led to the rise of iTunes and later Spotify — legal platforms that changed how we pay for music. Fast forward to today, and AI can “write” a song in the style of Drake or The Beatles in seconds. Who owns that music: the programmer, the AI, or no one at all? The law hasn’t caught up yet, but courts and lawmakers are already wrestling with these questions.

It’s not just music. Artists and writers are facing the same dilemma. In 2023, several lawsuits made headlines when visual artists sued AI companies for allegedly training their tools on copyrighted images without permission. Imagine spending years developing your own style of painting, only to see a computer mimic it in seconds. Pop culture has even jumped into the debate — remember when South Park released its “AI-generated” episode using ChatGPT? It made people laugh but also sparked serious conversations about whether AI-driven creativity should be protected, restricted, or shared freely.

Another area of change is how everyday people create. Platforms like TikTok and YouTube have blurred the line between professional and amateur work. A short dance video or meme can go viral and suddenly become “intellectual property.” Think about the viral “Renegade” dance — it started with a teenager on TikTok but was copied by countless influencers, often without credit. Copyright laws weren’t designed for a world where millions remix, duet, and share content daily. The challenge ahead will be finding a balance between protecting original creators and encouraging the collaborative, remix-driven creativity that defines modern culture.

So, where does copyright go from here? The future likely holds a mix of tighter rules for big platforms and more flexible protections for everyday creators. Blockchain technology may even allow artists to “stamp” their work with digital certificates, making it easier to track ownership across the internet. What’s clear is that copyright will continue to evolve, just like the technology driving creativity forward. For creators, the best defense is staying informed — and for lawmakers, the challenge is to build a copyright system that protects both innovation and imagination.

Read More

The Impact of Social Media on Trademark Enforcement

In the age of TikTok trends, Instagram influencers, and viral hashtags, your brand can become a household name overnight — but so can copycats. Social media is a double-edged sword when it comes to trademark enforcement. On one hand, it’s a powerful tool for brand exposure and connection. On the other, it’s a 24/7 marketplace where misuse, imitation, and even infringement of your brand can happen faster than you can hit “refresh.” For trademark holders, it’s no longer enough to monitor storefronts and websites — brand protection now lives on the timeline.

Let’s take Nike, for example. Their iconic “swoosh” is instantly recognizable, and they rigorously defend it. But in recent years, fake “Nike” accounts, knockoff product ads, and misuses of the logo have popped up across platforms like Facebook and Instagram. These kinds of unauthorized uses don’t just confuse consumers — they can also damage the brand’s reputation. That’s why companies like Nike employ dedicated teams and legal counsel to monitor social platforms for misuse and enforce their trademark rights when needed, often by filing takedown requests or pursuing legal action.

Social media also presents unique challenges that traditional trademark law wasn’t designed to handle. Meme culture and parody accounts blur the lines between fair use and infringement. Remember when HBO’s Game of Thrones coined the phrase “Winter is Coming”? That trademarked phrase showed up on everything from t-shirts to beer cans, often without permission. In the eyes of the law, context matters — is the use commercial or just a joke? Sometimes it’s both, and courts are still figuring out where to draw the line.

Fortunately, social media platforms now provide tools that help brand owners enforce their trademarks more efficiently. Most major platforms — including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube — have dedicated IP reporting forms that allow trademark owners to request the removal of infringing content. While these tools are helpful, they’re no substitute for a proactive strategy. Regular monitoring, consistent branding, and educating your audience about what is (and isn’t) an official account can go a long way in protecting your IP.

At the end of the day, your trademark is one of your most valuable assets — especially online. In a space where content spreads faster than ever, staying vigilant is key. Whether you’re a global brand or a growing startup, having a clear social media enforcement strategy can make all the difference. Need help protecting your brand in the wild world of social media? Our experienced IP attorneys are just a click away.

Read More

Navigating IP Compliance in Mergers and Acquisitions: What Every Business Should Know

When companies merge or one business acquires another, it’s not just the buildings, employees, or customer lists that change hands, intellectual property (IP) often plays a major role in the deal. From trademarks and patents to software code and trade secrets, a company’s IP can be one of its most valuable assets or its biggest hidden liability. That’s why navigating IP compliance during mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is critical for a smooth and successful transition.

Take, for example, Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram in 2012. While the $1 billion deal made headlines for the price tag, behind the scenes, Facebook’s legal team would have conducted rigorous IP due diligence. They needed to ensure that Instagram owned its code, had proper licenses for third-party tools, and held enforceable rights to its brand and user-generated content. Without confirming these details, Facebook could’ve ended up paying for assets it didn’t truly own, or worse, inheriting legal headaches.

IP due diligence is essentially a deep dive into what a company claims it owns versus what it actually owns. This process includes reviewing patent filings, checking for registered trademarks, confirming software licenses, and verifying employment agreements to make sure employees or contractors assigned their creations to the company. Miss this step, and surprises can surface. For example, if a startup being acquired used open-source code improperly, the buyer could end up in violation of licensing terms, leading to lawsuits or forced product changes after the deal closes.

Pop culture offers another cautionary tale: remember the legal fight over the rights to Marvel superheroes? When Disney acquired Marvel in 2009, it had to untangle decades of licensing deals and rights assigned to other studios. Spider-Man, for example, remained with Sony. Had Disney not understood the IP landscape, it could’ve assumed more rights than it legally obtained, costing it millions in litigation or missed revenue. That’s why mapping out all existing IP agreements, disputes, and restrictions before signing the dotted line is essential.

In short, whether you’re a Fortune 500 company or a growing startup, IP compliance can make or break an M&A transaction. If you’re buying, you want to ensure the IP is clean, clearly owned, and free of entanglements. If you’re selling, clean records and solid IP rights can increase your valuation. At our firm, we help clients navigate the twists and turns of IP in M&A, ensuring no surprises and no oversights, so the deal can go as smooth as possible. Ready to talk strategy? Let’s protect your assets before you seal the deal.

Have Questions? Schedule a free consultation with an Experienced Trademark Attorney in Los Angeles Today! For further information or schedule a no obligation consultation, please call Omni Legal Group at 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

Trademark Protection for LA Fashion Brands: From Downtown to Melrose

 

In the highly competitive fashion industry, where style and brand identity often dictate consumer choices, trademark protections can serve as a critical foundation for business success. Emerging fashion designers often focus intensely on creative aspects while overlooking the legal frameworks that are designed to protect their brands. In many instances, understanding trademark registration and brand protection strategies can mean the difference between building a sustainable fashion business and losing hard-earned brand recognition to competitors and/or counterfeiters.

Trademark Protections in Fashion

Trademarks in fashion encompass far more than just brand names. They include logos, distinctive design elements, color combinations, patterns, and even unique packaging that consumers associate with specific designers or fashion houses. For emerging designers, establishing trademark rights early provides essential legal protection and creates valuable business assets that appreciate over time.

The fashion industry’s global nature makes trademark protection particularly complex. A striking design that gains popularity can quickly spread across international markets, making comprehensive trademark strategy essential from the outset. Designers who neglect early trademark registration often discover that competitors have already secured rights in key markets, forcing costly rebranding efforts or limiting expansion opportunities.

Building Comprehensive Protection Strategies

Effective trademark protection requires a multi-layered approach. Start by conducting thorough trademark searches to ensure your chosen brand elements don’t conflict with existing registrations. This due diligence prevents expensive legal disputes and helps identify potential obstacles before investing heavily in brand development and marketing campaigns.

Consider registering multiple trademark classes simultaneously. Fashion brands typically need protection in Class 25 for clothing and accessories, but expanding businesses may require coverage in Class 35 for retail services, Class 42 for design services, or Class 9 for fashion-related apps and digital platforms. Strategic multi-class registration provides broader protection and supports business diversification.

Don’t overlook design patents for unique ornamental elements. While trademarks protect brand identifiers, design patents can protect distinctive patterns, prints, or three-dimensional designs that define your aesthetic. This dual protection strategy creates stronger barriers against copycats and counterfeiters.

International Considerations for Global Brands

Fashion’s global marketplace demands international trademark strategy from day one. The Madrid Protocol offers cost-effective international trademark registration through a single application, covering multiple countries simultaneously. However, understanding territorial differences in trademark law remains crucial, as protection requirements and enforcement mechanisms vary significantly across jurisdictions.

Pay particular attention to major fashion markets including the United States, European Union, United Kingdom post-Brexit, China, Japan, and emerging markets where counterfeiting poses significant risks. China’s first-to-file system makes early registration especially critical, as trademark squatters often register foreign brands before legitimate owners enter the market.

Enforcement and Brand Monitoring

Registration represents only the beginning of trademark protection. Active monitoring and enforcement are essential for maintaining trademark strength and preventing brand dilution. Implement comprehensive monitoring systems to detect unauthorized use, counterfeiting, and trademark infringement across physical and digital marketplaces.

Develop clear enforcement protocols including cease-and-desist procedures, opposition strategies for conflicting applications, and partnerships with customs authorities for combating counterfeits. Many emerging designers benefit from working with specialized fashion law firms that understand industry-specific challenges and enforcement mechanisms.

Social media platforms present both opportunities and challenges for brand protection. While these channels offer powerful marketing reach, they also provide venues for counterfeiters and trademark infringers. Establish brand protection programs with major platforms and implement robust content monitoring to protect your digital brand presence.

Building Long-Term Brand Value

Trademarks represent appreciating business assets that support financing, licensing, and eventual exit strategies. Well-protected fashion brands command premium valuations and attract investor interest, while unprotected brands face significant risks and limited growth potential.

Consider trademark licensing opportunities early in your business development. Licensed products can generate additional revenue streams while expanding brand recognition, but proper trademark protection is essential for maintaining control over brand quality and positioning.

Need Help with Securing Trademark Protections? Speak to an Experienced Trademark Lawyer in Los Angeles Today

By prioritizing trademark protection alongside creative development, emerging designers position themselves for sustainable success in the global fashion marketplace. The cost of early trademark protection pales in comparison to the potential losses from brand theft, counterfeiting, or forced rebranding that can devastate growing fashion businesses.

If you are an emerging fashion designer looking for legal guidance on how to register your brand and secure needed trademark protections, then now is the time to speak to an experienced trademark attorney in Los Angeles with Omni Legal Group. Our legal team is ready and able to assist by assessing your specific situation, researching relevant regulations and case law, and developing a compliance roadmap. We will be there to help you and to answer your questions.

Schedule a consultation today, call us at 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

How to Protect Your Invention in Silicon Beach: Patent Tips for LA Tech Entrepreneurs

The innovation ecosystem in and around Silicon Beach (including Venice, Playa Vista, and Santa Monica) is thriving with breakthrough technologies being developed and deployed on a routine basis. The pace of innovation is a big reason why Los Angeles tech entrepreneurs need to secure robust patent protections for their inventions. In such a highly competitive landscape, securing intellectual property rights can mean the difference between successful commercialization and costly litigation (on top of missed opportunity cost).

Belo are key strategies to help protect your invention in Silicon Beach.

Be Proactive and Pursue a Provisional Patent

Time is critical in Silicon Beach’s fast-moving environment. Filing a provisional patent application should be among your first priorities after developing a potentially patentable invention. Provisional patents provide a cost-effective way to establish an early filing date while giving you twelve months to refine your invention and assess its commercial viability. This approach is particularly valuable in Silicon Valley, where competitors may be working on similar technologies simultaneously.

During this provisional period, avoid public disclosure without proper protection. Many inventors mistakenly believe they can freely discuss their ideas at networking events or pitch competitions. However, premature disclosure can compromise your patent rights, especially in international markets that follow absolute novelty standards.

Understand Software Patent Challenges

Silicon Beach’s software-heavy innovation landscape presents unique patent challenges. Following the Supreme Court’s Alice decision, software patents face heightened scrutiny regarding patent eligibility. To strengthen software patent applications, focus on technical improvements to computer functionality rather than abstract business methods. Emphasize how your invention solves specific technical problems and improves system performance, efficiency, or capability.

Consider hybrid approaches that combine software with hardware elements, as these tend to have stronger patent protection prospects. Internet of Things (IoT) devices, AI-powered hardware systems, and novel user interfaces often present more defensible patent positions than pure software applications.

Conduct Comprehensive Prior Art Searches

Before investing significant resources in patent prosecution, conduct thorough prior art searches. Silicon Beach’s dense innovation ecosystem means similar technologies may already exist or be in development. Professional patent searches can reveal existing patents, published applications, and non-patent literature that could affect your application’s success.

Pay particular attention to international prior art, as many Silicon Beach companies compete globally. European, Japanese, and increasingly Chinese patent databases should be included in comprehensive searches. This diligence helps avoid costly prosecution of unpatentable inventions and informs strategic decisions about claim scope and positioning.

Build a Strategic Patent Portfolio

Rather than filing isolated patent applications, think strategically about portfolio development. Consider filing continuation applications to pursue different claim strategies and maintain prosecution flexibility. Divisional applications can protect distinct aspects of complex inventions, while continuation-in-part applications allow you to add improvements developed after your initial filing.

Focus on creating patent thickets around core technologies by filing multiple applications covering different aspects, implementations, and improvements of your key innovations. This approach provides stronger competitive positioning and more valuable licensing opportunities.

Plan for International Protection

Your Silicon Beach company may have global ambitions, which heightens the importance of developing an international patent strategy from the outset. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) provides an efficient mechanism for filing in multiple countries, though costs can escalate quickly. Prioritize key markets based on your commercialization strategy, competitive landscape, and enforcement capabilities.

Consider the timing of foreign filing decisions carefully, as you generally have twelve months from your priority date to file abroad while maintaining priority rights.

Need Help with Securing Patent Protections for Your Invention? Speak to an Experienced Patent Lawyer in Los Angeles Today

Whether you’re a tech entrepreneur in Venice, Playa Vista, or Santa Monica, the patent attorneys at Omni Legal Group are ready and able to assist you in securing valuable patent protections for your invention. We are a respected patent law firm based in Los Angeles with attorneys who possess a deep understanding of the complexities associated with IP and patent law. Whether it’s a provisional patent, non-provisional patent, design patent, utility patent, or plant patent application, the intellectual property lawyers at Omni legal Group are ready and able to help.

Schedule a consultation today, call 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

Emerging Trends in Copyright Law: What Creators Should Know

The Rules Are Changing—Fast

Whether you’re a musician, writer, designer, filmmaker, or social media influencer, protecting your creative work has never been more important—or more complex. As technology evolves and AI continues to blur the line between inspiration and imitation, copyright law is racing to keep up. From Hollywood lawsuits to blockchain-based royalties, recent trends are reshaping the creative landscape in real time. If you’re a content creator, here’s what you need to know to stay ahead of the curve.

 

  1. Creators’ Rights Meet AI: Transparency and Fair Use on the Rise

Artificial intelligence is transforming creative landscapes—but it’s also spotlighting big questions about how copyrighted work is used. In the U.S., courts recently sided with firms like Anthropic and Meta, ruling that training generative AI on large swathes of books can count as “fair use,” even without compensating creators. Meanwhile, legal efforts are picking up steam: in California, lawmakers introduced the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act, which would force AI developers to disclose copyrighted works used in training their models. In the UK, a new amendment is now under debate that encourages—but doesn’t require—AI firms to be transparent about copyrighted content in their data. The takeaway for creators? The rules around AI are evolving fast, and staying informed is essential.

 

  1. Hollywood Strikes Back: Major Lawsuits Take Center Stage

Not everyone is cheering on AI. Some of the world’s biggest creators are pushing back. Just this June, Disney and Universal sued Midjourney over its use of iconic characters like Shrek and Spider‑Man, claiming copyright infringement and challenging the AI industry’s reliance on fair use. At the same time, talent across Hollywood—including Natasha Lyonne and major studios—are calling for stronger protections for creative content, warning that unchecked AI use could devalue artistic work.

 

  1. Deepfakes, Likeness Rights, and Global Protections Expand

Another big trend: protecting people’s likenesses from misuse by AI. In the U.S., lawmakers are exploring bills like the NO FAKES Act to give individuals control over how their image or voice is used in deepfake content. Meanwhile, Denmark is taking a proactive stance: its proposed law would grant every citizen legal ownership over their face, voice, and performance, making unauthorized AI imitations actionable—and tech platforms could face fines if they fail to remove deepfakes after notification. This global movement raises the bar for creators to safeguard their personal rights.

 

  1. Small Claims, Smart Contracts, and Blockchain Make Rights Accessible

Good news for creators: enforcing copyright no longer always means expensive lawyers. In the U.S., the Copyright Claims Board (part of the CASE Act) gives creators a simplified, affordable venue—like filing a small‑claims lawsuit—for recoveries up to $15,000 per work, with a total cap of $30,000. At the same time, emerging technologies are helping too: blockchain-based systems now offer secure, transparent records of ownership, and smart contracts can automate licensing and royalty payments. These tools make it easier for creators to manage, monitor, and monetize their work.

 

  1. Pop‑Culture Spotlight: Taylor Swift and the Power of Ownership

On the pop‑culture front, few stories better illustrate creators’ empowerment than Taylor Swift‘s fight over her masters. Frustrated by losing control of her early albums, Swift re‑recorded them and ultimately bought back her original masters in 2025—making headlines and shifting how the music industry views ownership rights. This resonates deeply: it shows creators and their fans that taking control of one’s work isn’t abstract—it’s real, impactful, and achievable.

 

Stay Informed, Stay Protected

Copyright law is no longer just the concern of big studios or record labels—it’s a daily reality for content creators at every level. As new technologies challenge traditional ideas of ownership and originality, it’s never been more important to understand your rights and how to enforce them. Whether you’re protecting a song, a screenplay, a design, or your own voice and image, staying informed about these trends—and seeking expert legal guidance when needed—can make all the difference. The law is evolving, and creators who evolve with it will be the ones best positioned to thrive.

Read More

The Role of Patents in Commercializing USC and UCLA University Research

Universities, including USC and UCLA, have long been engines of scientific discovery and technological innovation, but the path from research innovation to commercial application can be challenging, especially when it comes to navigating the complexities of the patent application process.

Overview of the Patent Protection Framework

Patents play a crucial role in the commercialization of USC and UCLA university research. Patents serve as both protective shields and commercial catalysts that enable academic research to reach the public marketplace.

For context, patents generally provide universities with exclusive rights to their inventions for a specified period, typically 20 years from the filing date. This exclusivity creates a temporary monopoly that allows academic institutions to recoup their research investments and incentivize further innovation and research endeavors. In other words, without U.S. patent protection, competitors could freely copy and commercialize university discoveries, eliminating the financial incentive for companies to invest in the costly process of bringing academic research to market.

In effect, federal patent protections help ensure that universities like USC and UCLA can economically justify investments in research and development without concern to immediate competition.

Technology Transfer and Licensing

Universities typically commercialize their patented technologies through technology transfer offices, which serve as intermediaries between academic researchers and industry partners. These offices evaluate the commercial potential of university inventions, file patent applications, and negotiate licensing agreements with companies willing to develop the technology further.

Licensing arrangements can take various forms, from exclusive licenses that grant a single company the right to develop and market the technology, to non-exclusive licenses that allow multiple companies to use the innovation. The choice depends on factors such as the technology’s development stage, market size, and the level of investment required for commercialization.

Revenue generated from patent licensing provides universities with funding for additional research while offering companies access to cutting-edge innovations they might not have developed internally. This symbiotic relationship has proven particularly successful in fields like biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and information technology, where academic research often leads to breakthrough discoveries.

Understanding the Bayh-Dole Act

When it comes to navigating the university patent commercialization process, it is important to have an understanding of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which allowed universities to retain ownership of inventions developed with federal funding.

Prior to this legislation, the government held rights to most university research, creating barriers to commercialization since private companies were reluctant to invest in developing technologies they couldn’t exclusively control.

Since Bayh-Dole’s enactment, university patent activity has increased dramatically. For example, the number of patents issued to universities has grown from fewer than 250 annually in the early 1980s to over 6,000 per year at present. This surge has coincided with the emergence of numerous university spin-off companies and the development of major industries built on academic research, including the biotechnology sector.

Looking Forward

The role of patents in university research commercialization continues to evolve as technology advances and global competition intensifies. Universities are increasingly sophisticated in their approach to intellectual property management but should make sure to retain experienced and knowledgeable legal counsel to help develop effective strategies for commercializing innovations and promoting educational and research missions.

Have Questions About the Patent Application Process? Speak to an Experienced Patent Lawyer in Los Angeles Today

If you have questions regarding the patent application process, including applications related to university-led research efforts, then now is the time to speak to an experienced and knowledgeable patent lawyer in Los Angeles with Omni Legal Group. We are a reputable and renowned patent law firm in Los Angeles with lawyers who possess a deep understanding of the complexities associated with IP and patent law. Whether it’s a provisional patent, non-provisional patent, design patent, utility patent, or plant patent application, the intellectual property lawyers at Omni legal Group are ready and able to help.

Schedule a consultation today, call 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

Influencer Collabs and Co-Branding: Trademark Considerations for Los Angeles Creatives

Influencer marketing, particularly in and around Los Angeles, has proliferated rapidly and created new opportunities for brands to reach consumers through authentic, personalized content. However, as influencer collaborations evolve from simple endorsements to complex co-branding opportunities, it is important to be cognizant of applicable trademark laws and related legal issues. Taking trademarks into consideration early in the negotiation process can help the parties involved and mitigate the risk of a costly legal dispute.

The Trademark Landscape in Influencer Marketing

Trademarks serve as source identifiers, distinguishing goods and services in the marketplace. In influencer collaborations, multiple trademark issues can arise when personal brands intersect with commercial entities. Influencers often develop their own trademark rights through consistent use of names, logos, catchphrases, or distinctive visual elements that identify their personal brand. Similarly, companies bring established trademarks that represent years of brand building and consumer recognition.

When these entities collaborate, the resulting partnership must carefully navigate overlapping trademark rights. The challenge intensifies when collaborations involve creating new products, services, or content that incorporates elements from both parties’ trademark portfolios. Without proper legal frameworks, these partnerships can inadvertently create confusion about trademark ownership, usage rights, and future commercial exploitation.

Co-Branding Complexities

Co-branding partnerships between influencers and companies present particularly complex trademark challenges. When an influencer’s personal brand appears alongside a company’s trademark on products or promotional materials, questions arise about who owns the resulting intellectual property and how it can be used in future marketing efforts.

Consider a scenario where a fashion influencer collaborates with a clothing brand to create a signature line. The products may feature the influencer’s name, the company’s logo, and potentially new design elements created specifically for the collaboration. Each of these elements may have distinct trademark implications, requiring careful delineation of ownership rights and usage permissions.

Companies must also consider whether their association with an influencer’s personal brand could dilute their own trademark rights or create unwanted associations. Conversely, influencers risk having their personal brand overshadowed or misrepresented when partnering with larger commercial entities.

Key Contractual Protections

Successful influencer collaborations require comprehensive agreements that address trademark usage, ownership, and protection. These contracts should clearly define how each party’s trademarks can be used during the partnership, including specific guidelines for logo placement, brand messaging, and visual presentation standards.

Licensing provisions must specify the scope, duration, and territorial limits of trademark usage rights. Companies typically grant influencers limited licenses to use their trademarks in approved contexts, while influencers may reciprocate by allowing companies to use their name or likeness in marketing materials. These licenses should include quality control provisions to ensure that trademark usage maintains brand standards and protects the trademark owner’s reputation.

Termination clauses are equally important, establishing how trademark usage will be handled if the partnership ends. This includes provisions for removing trademarked content from social media platforms, discontinuing product sales, and addressing any remaining inventory that features both parties’ trademarks.

Challenges with Enforcement and Monitoring

The digital nature of influencer marketing creates unique enforcement challenges. Social media platforms, websites, and digital content can be difficult to monitor and control, making it challenging to ensure proper trademark usage throughout a collaboration’s lifecycle.

Companies and LA creatives need to proactively establish monitoring systems to track how their trademarks appear in content. In addition, influencers need to protect their personal brand from unauthorized use by third parties seeking to capitalize on their success. This dual monitoring responsibility requires clear communication channels and defined response procedures for addressing trademark misuse.

Why It Makes Sense to Hire a Los Angeles Trademark Attorney

Successful influencer collaborations require proactive trademark planning that helps protect your interests while enabling creative and fruitful partnerships. This is where hiring a skilled and knowledgeable trademark lawyer in Los Angeles can pay dividends. By addressing complex legal issues early in the collaborative process, influencers and companies can focus on creating compelling content while safeguarding their valuable trademark assets for future growth and commercialization opportunities.

Need Help with Legal Issues Related to Collaborations and Co-Branding? Speak to an Experienced Trademark Lawyer in Los Angeles

As you can see, the issues around influencer collaborations and co-branding initiatives can become quite complex, particularly around trademarks and other legal issues. If you are contemplating such a collaboration and are concerned about protecting your IP, then now is the time to speak to an experienced and knowledgeable trademark attorney in Los Angeles with Omni Legal Group. Our legal team is ready and able to assist by assessing your specific situation, researching relevant regulations and case law, and developing a compliance roadmap. We will be there to help you and to answer your questions.

Schedule a consultation today, call us at 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

Intellectual Property and the Spirit of Independence: Why Protecting Your Ideas Is the Modern American Dream

When we think of the Fourth of July, we often picture fireworks, flags, and the birth of a nation. But Independence Day also represents something deeper—the power to think freely, build boldly, and own the fruits of your labor. That spirit of innovation and ownership didn’t stop with the Declaration of Independence. In fact, it continues today in the form of intellectual property (IP) rights—modern tools that protect your ideas, inventions, and brands so you can control and benefit from what you create.

The Founding Fathers understood the importance of protecting ideas. So much so that the U.S. Constitution includes a specific clause—Article I, Section 8, Clause 8—that gives Congress the power “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.” In plain English? They believed inventors, artists, and thinkers should have the right to own and protect their work—a radical idea at the time. And it laid the foundation for the U.S. patent and copyright systems we rely on today.

One of the earliest and most famous examples is President George Washington signing the first U.S. patent in 1790. The recipient? A man named Samuel Hopkins, for his method of making potash (a key ingredient in fertilizer and soap). Fast forward to today, and patents are still a cornerstone of American innovation—just ask the creators of the iPhone or life-saving medical technologies. And trademarks? They’re what keep your brand identity—your business name, logo, and reputation—safe from imitators. Think of how recognizable names like Nike®, Apple®, or Coca-Cola® are. Without trademark protection, anyone could use those names and confuse customers.

But here’s the thing—IP isn’t just for big corporations. Whether you’re a startup, a solo entrepreneur, a content creator, or an inventor in your garage, your ideas are valuable. In fact, they’re often your most valuable asset. Registering a trademark, filing for a patent, or protecting your original content with copyright ensures that you decide how your creations are used—not someone else. It’s the modern form of independence: the freedom to control what you build and how it’s used.

So this Independence Day, while we celebrate the freedoms our country was built on, take a moment to think about your own independence as a creator, business owner, or entrepreneur. Are your ideas protected? Are you building your brand on a solid legal foundation? If not, now’s the time to act. At Omni Legal Group, we help protect what matters most—your vision, your voice, and your future.

Safeguard your innovations and embrace the spirit of independence. Call 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to schedule your consultation today.

Read More

Navigating Patent Eligibility for AI Inventions After the USPTO’s AI Guidance Update

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) took a bold step in July 2024 issuing important guidance designed to help evaluate AI-related patent claims. Notably, the USPTO guidance takes the position that AI-powered, or AI-influenced, inventions, when claimed appropriately, can be eligible for patent protections.

The USPTO guidance is a tacit acknowledgement that AI-centric patent applications have spiked to the point where targeted analysis on how to address AI-related issues is warranted.  For context, the guidance is designed to help USPTO personnel and stakeholders develop a deeper understanding of the key factors that need to be analyzed when evaluating patent eligibility of AI inventions during proceedings in front of the USPTO. In addition, the USPTO guidance provides a series of AI-specific examples to help clarify how the USPTO will assess the subject matter eligibility for AI inventions.

Overview of the USPTO’s AI Guidance Update

The USPTO’s AI guidance is broken down into five sections. Each section addresses a different aspect of patent eligibility and the USPTO’s AI and emerging technology efforts. Let’s take a look at each section:

Section 1. Overview of Existing Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

The USPTO makes clear that its existing subject matter eligibility guidance applies to all technologies, including AI inventions. Though, it’s worth noting that the guidance fuses the criteria for eligibility into a single analysis, addressing whether a claimed invention falls into one of the four statutory categories, including:

  • Processes
  • Machines
  • Manufactures, and
  • compositions of matter

The guidance also addresses whether the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception, such as an abstract idea, law of nature, and/or natural phenomena.

Section 2. Evaluation of AI Inventions

The USPTO guidance update provides specific instructions for evaluating AI inventions, including:

  • Whether the claimed invention recites an abstract idea; and
  • Whether the claimed invention integrates a judicial exception into a practical application.

Section 3. Abstract Ideas and AI Inventions

The USPTO guidance provides insights on how to distinguish between claims that simply involve an abstract idea and claims that recite an abstract idea. This is an important distinction when it comes to AI-centric inventions that often involve abstract ideas and concepts (e.g., mathematical equations and/or methods of organizing types of activities).

Section 4. Practical Application and Improvements

A key consideration in determining subject matter eligibility, according to the USPTO, is whether the claimed invention integrates a judicial exception into a practical application. This can be demonstrated by showing that the claimed invention improves the functioning of a computer or another technology or technical field.

The guidance highlights the importance of claims that provide a particular solution to a problem or a specific way to achieve a desired outcome, rather than merely claiming the idea of a solution. For example, claims to a rule-based system for animating lip synchronization and facial expressions in three-dimensional characters were found to improve existing technological processes and were thus eligible.

Section 5. AI-Assisted Inventions

The USPTO guidance clarifies that the method of invention creation, including the use of AI, is not a consideration in the subject matter eligibility analysis. Nevertheless, patent protection should only be sought for AI-assisted inventions where an individual, or individuals, made a significant contribution to the claimed invention.

Key Takeaways from the USPTO Guidance

Overall, the USPTO’s AI guidance highlights the fact that AI claims must go beyond mere data processing steps by including additional elements that result in tangible and practical outcomes. Viable claims need to emphasize how the integration of AI leads to specific technological advancements. For example, an applicant who can demonstrate that an AI model improves the functionality or performance of a system can strengthen their claim that the invention provides a practical utility, which is necessary for patent eligibility.

Have Questions? Contact an Experienced Patent Lawyer in Los Angeles

If you have questions about patent application process for an AI-centric invention, then now is the time to speak to an experienced and knowledgeable patent lawyer in Los Angeles with the Omni Legal Group. We are a respected patent law firm in Los Angeles and understand the complexities of IP and patent law. Whether it’s a provisional patent, non-provisional patent, design patent, utility patent, or plant patent application, the lawyers at Omni legal Group are ready and able to help.

Schedule a consultation today, call 855.433.2226 or visit www.OmniLegalGroup.com to learn more.

Read More

About Omni Legal Group

omni
The Omni Legal Group was founded in Los Angeles, California by Omid Khalifeh.

We Are Social

The Great IDEA Newsletter

The Great IDEA: Twitter and the Law How to avoid getting in Twouble Twitter makes it easy for users communicating to large audiences over the Internet. There's very little preparation that needs to go into what you're going to say and in seconds you can conceivably communicate your message to millions of people. Read More
  The Great IDEA: Apple Awarded Sexting Patent As technology increases our access to limitless information so does the need for parental controls on advanced devices. Clearly recognizing this need, Apple was recently awarded a patent for a "Text-based communication control for personal communication device." Read More

PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW FIRM

FREE CONSULTATION

Call us for support
310-276-6664

Latest Posts

AI-Generated Content & IP Rights: What Every Business Should Know Now
AI-Generated Content & IP Rights: What Every Business Should Know Now
By Omid Khalifeh Dec 6, 2025
Trademark Infringement: Identifying and Responding to Threats
Trademark Infringement: Identifying and Responding to Threats
By Omid Khalifeh Dec 6, 2025
Design Patents vs. Utility Patents: Understanding the Differences
Design Patents vs. Utility Patents: Understanding the Differences
By Omid Khalifeh Nov 21, 2025
The Importance of Trademark Registration: Protecting Your Brand
The Importance of Trademark Registration: Protecting Your Brand
By Omid Khalifeh Nov 14, 2025
Trade Secret Protection for LA Tech Startups: Best Practices and Risks
Trade Secret Protection for LA Tech Startups: Best Practices and Risks
By Omid Khalifeh Nov 7, 2025

Tags

Beverly Hills trademark attorney copyright lawyer los angeles intellectual property intellectual property law intellectual property lawyers los angeles international yoga day los angeles business attorney los angeles patent attorney Los Angeles trademark attorney omni legal group patent Patentability Search patent attorney beverly hills Patent Attorney in Los Angeles Patent attorney los angeles patent attorney santa monica patent lawyer beverly hills patent lawyer los angeles Patents patent search Trademark lawyer los angeles trademarks USPTO yoga

Posts pagination

« 1 2 3 … 34 »
SERVICES
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Cyber Law
  • Trade Secret Law
  • Business Consultancy
  • Mediation
CONNECT WITH US

logo

855.433.2226

info@omnilegalgroup.com

OFFICE LOCATIONS

Los Angeles
2029 Century Park East, Suite 400,
Los Angeles, CA 90067.
Tel: 310.860.2000
Beverly Hills
9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500,
Beverly Hills, CA 90210.
Tel: 424.901.8418
Santa Monica
2425 Olympic Blvd., #4000,
Santa Monica, CA 90404.
Tel: 310.276.6664
BUSINESS HOURS
Monday - Sunday: 9 AM to 5 PM

ABOUT USSERVICESCONTACT USRESOURCESPHILANTHROPY

Copyright 2024 Omni Legal Group - Patent & Trademark Law Firm in Los Angeles