Does copyright infringement arise out of publishing embedded content from third-party websites?

By Blog No Comments

            The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently determined that Mashable lawfully used a photojournalist’s photograph pursuant to a sublicense from Instagram. Following a motion to dismiss by defendants, Mashable and parent company, Ziff Davis, the court held no copyright infringement had occurred by embedding the Instagram photo in an article. As a result, the plaintiff’s, Stephanie Sinclair, complaint for copyright infringement was dismissed.             The dispute began in March 2016, when an article titled “10 female photojournalists with their lenses on social justice” was published. The article highlighted the work of ten female…

Read More

What types of intellectual property issues has Netflix’s popular “Tiger King” series presented?

By Trademarks No Comments

            Netflix’s “Tiger King” has become a mainstay in many American households during this period of quarantine. Indeed, in the first few days following the hit, true-crime documentary miniseries’ March 20th debut, more than thirty-four million viewers tuned in to follow the demise of Joe Exotic. Exotic is a self-proclaimed “gay, gun-carrying redneck with a mullet” who owns a big cat roadside zoo and animal park in Oklahoma. Moreover, those who watched learned that Joe Exotic’s intellectual property infringement was the first step in a series of negative events that eventually led to his conviction and prison sentence.             While…

Read More

Can one copyright a graphic depiction of a mood?

By Copyright Law No Comments

            In an action to determine whether certain anthropomorphized characters representing human emotions qualify for copyright protection, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the action. The lawsuit was filed by Denise Daniels and The Moodster Company, who created “The Moodsters.” In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that The Walt Disney company and Pixar infringed their copyrighted characters through the movie “Inside Out.” The Ninth Circuit also affirmed the district court’s denial of plaintiffs’ claim for breach of an implied-in-fact contract under California law based on plaintiffs’ alleged disclosure of information about…

Read More

What innovation has resulted from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic?

By Blog, Software & Technology Patent No Comments

            As the physical world has become increasingly inaccessible as a result of lockdowns announced in various countries, people have availed themselves of the virtual world. Numerous existing and novel applications have seen a significant increase in traffic as users find themselves seeking mental sustenance. Indeed, while applications such as HouseParty, Zoom, WhatsApp, and Netflix have addressed these needs and desires, other software has been released that may directly address the coronavirus pandemic.             Salcit Technologies is an India-based startup that has released an application that can be downloaded to one’s smartphone and that purportedly provides on demand respiratory assessment…

Read More

Can a test for COVID-19 be subject to patent infringement?

By Patent and Trademark No Comments

            Labrador Diagnostics has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against BioFire Diagnostics, a company that makes medical testing equipment and most recently, developed a test for the new coronavirus. The lawsuit alleges patent infringement of two of Labrador’s patents related to testing the presence of substances in bodily fluids. Labrador purchased these, and other, original Theranos’ patents after the failed blood-testing startup sold its patent portfolio to Fortress Investment Group in 2018.             One of the Theranos patents, United States Patent No. 8,283,155, teaches point-of-care fluidic systems and uses thereof. The…

Read More

Is Quibi liable for patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation of its turnstyle technology?

By Blog No Comments

            Eko, an interactive video company, accused Quibi of infringing one of its patents as well as misappropriating its trade secrets. In response, Quibi preemptively filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of non-inringement of Eko’s patent and no misappropriation of trade secrets. The following day, Eko filed a complaint for patent infringement in the same court.             In Quibi’s original complaint, the mobile-video company seeks relief from Eko’s attempts to tarnish Quibi’s brand and interfere with the highly anticipated launch of its platform. Quibi argues Eko’s allegations…

Read More

Is “Panda Libre,” an Arizona-based restaurant offering Mexican and Asian fusion, likely to be confused with Panda Express?

By Blog No Comments

            In August 2019, Panda Express sent a cease and desist letter to a Gilbert, Arizona-based restaurant, Panda Libre, which offers “Mexican and Asian Fusion” cuisine. In this correspondence, the fast food giant advised Panda Libre of its trademark rights and demanded that it cease using the mark, PANDA LIBRE. The proprietors of Panda Libre failed to respond to this letter in writing. However, attorneys on behalf of Panda Libre advised Panda Express’ counsel that it is unwilling to change its name and intends to continue use of the same.             Panda Express was originally founded in 1973 as “Panda…

Read More

Is a San Francisco-based artist entitled to compensation or other remedies for Disney and Pixar’s alleged theft of her “vanicorn” copyright?

By Blog No Comments

            A San Francisco-based tattoo artist, known as Sweet Cicely Daniher, is suing the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, Pixar Animation Studios and Kori Rae, producer of the movie Onward, for creating an animated version of her unicorn van without her permission. Moreover, Daniher alleges that her “vanicorn” was copied under “wickedly misleading pretenses.” As such, the plaintiff demands compensatory damages, statutory damages, and an injunction, such as to restrain the defendants from promoting, selling, or marketing the allegedly infringing motion picture, which is set to release in March.             Daniher is an artist, photographer and tattooist based in San…

Read More

Can San Francisco 49ers’ linebacker Kwon Alexander defeat Dallas Cowboys’ defender DeMarcus Lawrence’s allegations of trademark infringement?

By Blog No Comments

            In this weekend’s Super Bowl LIV, the San Francisco 49ers face the Kansas City Chiefs. Meanwhile, off the field, the Dallas Cowboys are prepared to take on the 49ers in a court of law. In the 49ers’ long march to the Super Bowl, linebacker Kwon Alexander filed two trademark applications for “HOT BOYZZ” and “HOT BOYZZ UNIVERSITY.” Cowboys’ defenders and, namely, DeMarcus Lawrence claim they have been using the moniker since 2018 and that the 49ers copied it one year later.             In October 2018, Tankland Ventures, LLC, an entity owned by DeMarcus Lawrence, filed a trademark application for…

Read More

Does laCalifornienne’s colorful customization of authentic Rolex timepieces constitute fair use?

By Blog No Comments

            Late in 2019, Rolex filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that California-based laCalifornienne has been marketing and offering for sale counterfeit timepieces bearing Rolex’s trademarks. Rolex has been offering for sale its iconic timepieces for more than 114 years, including one of its most popular designs, the Rolex Oyster Perpetual. Rolex possesses trademark rights in and to ROLEX, OYSTER, and OYSTER PERPETUAL, in addition to trade dress in the designs of its timepieces. The lawsuit lists causes of action for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and false designation of origin.            …

Read More
Call Us: 855.433.2226